Author： EnglishTeacher 2021-09-13
Chinese parents worried their children will lose out as a result of education reforms that have led to a reduction in the amount of time spent teaching English are looking for ways to make up the gap.
Although their options are further limited after a crackdown on private tutoring, they will not easily be deterred.
“Many parents, those who deem English as an important tool to help you connect with the world, are figuring out solutions to offset the impact,” says Stella Zou, who runs a 500-member social media group for those who share her concerns.
Last year, she said her daughter took four English classes a week, supplemented by four further online sessions with US-based teachers through a private educational platform.
But when the new semester began last week, she found that the number of English classes had been cut to just three a week at her daughter’s public school in Beijing, while the online English sessions had fallen victim to a government crackdown on tuition companies.
“English seems to be the subject hit the hardest by the education reforms,” she sighed.
Over the summer, the 41-year-old business owner bought a bookshelf worth of English language textbooks – ranging from the Reading Explorer series by National Geographic Learning to Wonders by McGraw-Hill Education. She now plans to teach her eight-year-old daughter herself.
The reforms did not explicitly target English, and were intended to lighten students’ workloads and allow them to develop their sporting and artistic skills.
However, they also come amid a growing debate about whether most Chinese people need to spend so much time studying the language – fuelled in part by a rising tide of nationalism that has seen some prominent figures warning against exposing people to foreign ideas.
There was no national order to cut the number of school hours spent learning English, but many did so as schools across the country adjusted their curriculums to comply with the order.
For example, many schools in Beijing, Shanghai, Sichuan and other provinces have cut back on language teaching in favour of more time spent on sporting and artistic activities.
Shanghai, the most international city on the mainland, even said last month that students would no longer be taking final English proficiency examinations to ease the academic burden placed on students.
It follows a decision in February by the northeastern province of Liaoning to lower the maximum number of marks available from English in the university entrance exam, thereby reducing its importance for achieving a good overall grade.
But for Zou and other concerned parents, the impact of the crackdown on private tuition is much more severe.
In July, new rules were introduced that ordered tutoring and education services firms to convert to non-profit status, banned them from offering classes in the core curriculum subjects – Chinese, maths and English – during weekends and school holidays, and prohibited the use of foreign curriculums or classes held with foreigners based outside the country.
Online sessions with tutors outside China – once a regular feature of Zou’s daughter’s life – are now banned.
The Beijing-based start-up VIPKid, which has now said it will stop offering such services, said it had employed almost 90,000 teachers in the US and Canada and almost a million Chinese students had signed up for its classes. Anyway, they are now recruiting foreign teachers based in China to meet the demand from anxious parents.
“The government seems to have decided that English is not so important,” Zou said, “I was so surprised by the moves. When I was a student, English was widely regarded as an essential subject in China’s opening up to the world.”
China has been encouraging its people to learn English since the opening-up policy began in the late 1970s and two decades later the subject formed part of the primary school curriculum.
In 2001, the Ministry of Education issued guidelines, urging primary schools in all but the most remote parts of the country to ensure English classes were offered no later than the third grade to “modernise education to face the world and meet the demands of the future”.
But this trend appears to have peaked with the 2008 Beijing Olympics, which offered China the opportunity to showcase the dramatic changes of the previous decades.
Sun Ning, 34, a railway engineer in Beijing, said he welcomed the move to cut the number of hours spent learning English. “Many people don’t use English much at work. When we need it, we can resort to smart AI-enabled devices for translation. It’s very convenient,” Sun said.
In Beijing, Zou said she was going to hoard textbooks for fear they would be removed from the open market.
But not everyone has the time or the skills to teach their children themselves.
Yuan Jie, 36, a mother from a remote part of Sichuan, said cutting back on English would put her 10-year-old son at a disadvantage.
“We live in a fourth-tier county, where children’s education depends heavily on the public school system,” she said.
“My son’s English classes have been cut from three a week to two this semester. I’m so worried that he will lose the edge in future competition with his peers in big cities, but I don’t know what to do.”